The Legend of the Scorched Road
http://blueblurrylines.blogspot.fr/2013/11/cash-landrum-ufo-case-legend-of.html
http://blueblurrylines.blogspot.fr/2013/11/cash-landrum-ufo-case-legend-of.html
Vous n'êtes pas connecté. Connectez-vous ou enregistrez-vous
Re-Gilles F. a écrit:Nouveau billet de Curt:
The Cash-Landrum Controversy: Witness or Investigator Culpability
Thank you!sentry579 a écrit:I've updated the blog post to include a full transcript:
Transcript: Vickie Landrum NUFORC Call
http://home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/Klass.htm7. In attempting to determine whether a UFO report is a hoax, an investigator should rely on physical evidence, or the lack of it where evidence should exist, and should not depend on character endorsements of the principals involved.
Take Travis Walton's body for example (I'm no expert on the case). It should show signs of7. In attempting to determine whether a UFO report is a hoax, an investigator should rely on physical evidence, or the lack of it where evidence should exist, and should not depend on character endorsements of the principals involved.
Dernière édition par sentry579 le 18/11/13, 05:49 pm, édité 1 fois (Raison : spelling)
I agree, but it is also easy to misapply the principle by making false assumptions.sentry579 a écrit:I'm over-explaining the obvious, but some UFO stories involve actions that must leave traces if it was a physical event.
I think they did act at some points like genuine victims (or whatever they really were). Searching for instance to come in contact with some helo pilots isn't really a hoaxer behavior. It as nothing to do with UFOs.Sentry a écrit: I hold out for the possibility there was some kind of genuine experience at the root of the story.
There's a lot of medical information in the book. I really do hope JS didn't just make it up. That would be disgusting.Sebastien a écrit:we don't know anything of his hypothetical queries after the documents.
http://devoid.blogs.heraldtribune.com/12797/klass-act-no-principles/Cash and the Landrums authorized MUFON investigator John Schuessler to share their medical records with me, which he did. The story was complex and gruesome.
For years, Klass had badgered the victims, and Schuessler, for access to their hospital records. Aware of his proclivities, they refused to comply. “I said, look Phil, why don’t you come up with what you think happened, publish it, and after you do that, we’ll be happy to supply you with the records,” recalls Schuessler from his home in Colorado.
Klass condensed Cash-Landrum into a single page. Rather than posit an alternative scenario, he simply ascribed the whole thing to a hoax founded upon pre-existing medical conditions. Even the Army's own Inspector General investigation specifically cited a lack of evidence for a hoax.
“Klass was a low-life and a bully who used his Aviation Week credentials to hold himself up as an expert,” says Schuessler, retired project manager for space shuttle flight operations at Johnson Space Center. “He just made up stories any way he saw fit.”
Non, c'est Vickie.marcassite a écrit:Est-ce la conductrice ?
(Si quelqu'un peut traduire la note 18 en page 6 qui en parle ?)
18. J'ai cherché à avoir l'opinion d'un autre pathologiste ici dans les environs [du comté] de Madison. Mon expert m'a indiqué que sous le microscope alopecia areata est un diagnostic spécifique, pas un diagnostic poubelle. [NdT : "poubelle" je suppose que ça veut dire "par défaut"] Raison de plus de douter du diagnostic du pathologiste de là-bas à Houston.
- The “flame reflections” that I refer to in the article are actually part of a broader phenomenon that I have since called “Artificial Light Pillars in High Cloud” (a six-part article on these light pillars can be found here: http://www.caelestia.be/article01a.html).
- There are various paragraphs in the text that I now feel should have been either left out or rewritten.
- The German photos included at the end are not a good example of the type of pillar that, I think, caused the CASH/LANDRUM report. Most of the pillars that are shown in these pictures are reflections from unshielded city lights in low cloud (ice mist). What we need for the CASH/LANDRUM report is a mirrored image of a big flame in cirriform cloud. Flames from a gas well or a petrochemical complex may have been responsible for the twin pillars in the bottom picture, but I never managed to establish that with certainty.
A much better example of a bright reflection is this one: http://www.caelestia.be/OP-PH-21.html. It was caused by a flame from a refinery near Terneuzen, The Netherlands. We calculated that the reflection occurred in 16,000 feet high cirrus clouds.
Despite the fact that there are quite a few shortcomings in the text I'm sending you, there is no doubt in my mind that the first phase of the CASH/LANDRUM incident was indeed caused by an atmospheric reflection of a bright flame. Compare for instance the image I just linked to with the following descriptions given in SCHUESSLER’s book:
- Betty: first a “red glow” near the horizon, then also “a vertical streak of red” that “appeared to be miles away”, but “stood out clearly in the sky”.
- Vickie: “a long streak of fire” that didn’t move.
Or in HENDRY’s recently surfaced preliminary report:
- “The whole sky seemed bright ahead of them”; “Then the witnesses became aware that a vertically oblong form was suspended over the road”.
Note also that, like with the light pillar caused by the flare at Terneuzen, the Texan witnesses too wondered if Jesus was going “to come out the fire in the sky”.
The light source responsible for the CASH/LANDRUM reflection - if that is what it was - can only be tracked down if we now the azimuth and elevation of the vertical streak of light (among other things, it was never a 100% clear to me where the car was when the “object” was first spotted). If it turns out that a big flame from an industrial site is impossible, we might be looking at an accident with a pipe line that, for some reason, needed to be covered up.
I still think it’s a pity that I never finished this article, but there were simply too few useful data in SCHUESSLER’s study to make a solid case for this theory.
Dernière édition par Gilles F. le 21/11/13, 09:10 pm, édité 2 fois
Sujets similaires
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
|
|